Here, I attached to my letter in early November asking for protection and I have not received a response four months later. Reading it will understand much of what I have been explaining and if you have questions and I will try to answer them.

For the attention of EB Coordinator of Euskadi, the coordinator of the President and the Secretary of EB Organization of Euskadi and appropriate to the presidency of EB.

Carlos Gonzalez Astiz, EB Affiliate and candidate No 5 by the coalition EB-Berdeak-Aralar in Ordizia.

In Ordizia to November 2, 2009.

I turn to the direction of EB in Euskadi to the apparent helplessness I feel by what they regard as a blatant manipulation of the smallest democratic and legal principles on the part of some leaders of the organization in Gipuzkoa.

I think they know, and if it does not surprise me even more, because it would mean that they have to inform you skew the information even before the address, Ordizia's candidacy in the last elections and the results themselves have many special place even before them.

Beginning as the assembly of Ordizia EB defined a list in relation to posts that we corresponded Antxon Karmelo Karrera and manipulated to lead to registration. A corresponding EB will meet the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 11th and 13th candidate. The EB approved assembly that people who fill these posts were in this order: Maialen Calparsoro, Carlos Gonzalez, Leontxi Uranga, Marisol Viana, Julen Carrasco, Manolo Sanchez and Txisto (Silvestre Calparsoro).

For art-birloque birlí Registry changed the third to the fifth and finally Leontxi was third and I was fifth.

Then came the big surprise, because nobody, not even the most optimistic thought we were going to get three councilors in Ordizia. It is obvious that the outlawing of Batasuna's bid was the most voted (zero) provided that result. Then there were two problems Leontxi had committed only to go fill and it was not clear entering the days as a councilman and ETA announced it was returning to arms. Prior to this announcement, the assembly of the candidacy of Ordizia, had agreed not to take the council, while the apparent follow the peace process for two reasons, first to contribute actively to this process and second as a militant struggle against the law of parties. Aralar announced that recognized the right of EB to take the third council, but the use of that right meant the breakup of the coalition. In addition, mix an incident in Irun, also take off your to get me (played by Millán) which made tremble things Ordizia, because in our people, if Leontxi (3rd) did not hold the council, Aralar had the bull by the mango.

For one thing and another, later (two years ago) including the opposition says Maialen cogiese Calparsoro to be the third council because he considered politically incorrect, which in essence I agree with, not the council took third. In these Julen Carrasco appeared a few months ago he had announced with fanfare that he was retiring from the "front line" policy to make way for "younger" and irrelevantly announces - without discussing it with anyone, much less collectively - all over town - including council says it to other forces, and the mayor himself - is going to take the third council because, he says, feels a "moral obligation" to hold it against ETA. It should be noted that collectively discuss Ordizia is to bring the nomination because nothing is more organic, even if some want to argue, because there is no grassroots organization.

Finally, water does not move past the mill, but it has and that's it.

The matter for which I request the intervention of the address is because you are jumping the priority in the appointment of Ordizia. The 5th is ahead of the 9th and made a trick to try to change that order and that the 5th replacing the 3rd and the 9th to the 1st. It also has made the whole process ocultándoseme, having to learn through Aralar mate, a few days before being submitted for approval by the City Council Who has submitted my name to replace the 3rd but I know nothing about central to the election board in early October?

Using subterfuge to occupy the council had not been occupied, is an obvious manipulation because they change even the order of the factors. The councilor, candidate 1, resigned in July, 16 July, just a day before going to Mexico to live.

I know that dates have been changed to accompany the trick indicated, and that is illegal, criminal liability can arise for people presenting the document according to their interest to manipulate the delegation that they had asked the councilor. It is true that Maialen Calparsoro resign in October, and they know, the Secretary, the Mayor and Council of Ordizia and that was what made sense that the full council to defer the receipt of the communication of substitution by EB of resignation.

The problem is whether this should or should not know what the people of Ordizia. If you must know that there Guipúzcoa EB leaders who play with democracy in Ordizia. Who cheat the lists. That the people of the General Coordinator of EB do these things.

The problem is if I rely on the law and challenge the whole process of replacing and occupation of councils by the EB. It is very easy to prove, but everything is very easy to explain. Lot easier than some believe, but especially dire consequences for EB inter alia for the delay in municipal chores and the embarrassing spectacle that we hit these traps.

All this is easy to fix if you will. EB runs a document to the Central Electoral Board requesting the correction of an "error" administrative amending the order of priority and indicating that the 5th replacing the 1st and addressing the occupation of the third council as consideréis appropriate, but beg to be heard ordiziarras to not only one of them.

It is also very easy to complicate and probably the lack of protection by the management of EB Euskadi will I seek refuge in the UI state management in the Central Electoral Board, in municipal institutions and society itself ordiziarra.

From full municipal, Oct. 22, I've been waiting for an official called EB that I have not received. I have not handled anything, but if I am legally advised of all possible scenarios. I have received from a board member's suggestion to the letter and so I am doing.

So, I need an immediate response and clarification, because there are times that I have to play in the field of contestation that met on 5 November.

Waiting treated Democrats hope your news.

My phone number is xxxxxxxxxx and my email carlosastiz@gmail.com .

Carlos Gonzalez Astiz.

Tags: city council , city commission , EB , elections , Ordizia